Enterprise Engineering Forum

企业工程论坛
Categorized as: 系统实现,系统架构   Tagged as: ,, , , ,

Model-Driven Applications vs. Model-Driven Engineering

Author: Tong-Ying Yu,  Source: EE-Forum.org,  Published: 2013-03-08

Excerpt: A primary illustration to the differences and the relationships between model-driven engineering (MDE) and model-driven applications (MDApp).

It has been presented that model-driven engineering (MDE) or model-driven software development (MDSD) and model-driven applications (MDApp) [1] are indeed based one same fundamental, that is, the model-driven mechanism (MDM). See Figure 1, the left half, the four blue boxes and the relationships is adopted from Bézivin (2004) [2], which is the most common illustration to MDE and can be seen in many documents of MDE / MDSD. On which, we add the orange boxes to show that how the four parts in MDE / MDSD to be working together according to the principles of MDM. It seems this is not yet clearly appeared in literature although, of course, that is merely a re-interpretation to the existing truth in MDE–and this becomes one of many evidences to the universality of MDM.

mde-mdapp-fig1

Model-driven mechanism (MDM) in model-driven engineering (MDE)

 

In Figure 2, the box of Code Generator or Programmer is bypassed, and add the rest parts of a complete MDApp: the green boxes and the relationships. Figure 2 thereby shows the relationship between MDE / MDSD and MDApps.

mde-mdapp-fig2

It can be seen that, a MDM structure appears again–as the core of an MDApp. the modeling of applied model and the modeling of system model are the two completely independent different jobs, they are certainly separated into the two side of the gap (see here) and, can and should be done by different people independently; this also separates the developer (such as the programmer shown in Figure 1) and the (description of) target thing (e.g. the applying business); what holding them to be relevant is the modeling knowledge (Metamodela). The concerns of business by user and of system implementation by programmer / designer, are therefore completely separated, as well as between the modeling knowledge and applied model (this is very significant).

As shown in Figure 2 the target thing is certainly a part of so-called application, and how it to be handled (to be related with the system / software) is based on (via) the applied model. Obviously, the software (platform) of an MDApp can be developed by MDSD or some approaches else; it is quite different work to design and implement an MDApp and a traditional application system. The first, and most important task to development of an MDApp is specify and formulate the modeling knowledge (Metamodela) for the applied model of the target thing (e.g., so-called business domain), this is quite different to the domain modeling or requirements modeling / specifying in traditional application development.

Note that, the meta-metamodel(s) for Metamodels and Metamodela is not always necessary; it is also not necessary to be in common, though that is interesting.

—-
[1] Yu, Tong-Ying. “Model-Driven Applications: Using Model-Driven Mechanism to Bridge the Gap between Business and IT.” In Advances and Applications in Model-Driven Software Engineering. Díaz, V.G. et al. eds. IGI Global, August 2013 (in press, see Recent Work on Model-Driven Applications (MDApp). Note that the title of book be changed by publisher, the original title is “Progressions and Innovations in Model-Driven Software Engineering.” Updated on 13 Mar)

[2] Bézivin, Jean. “In search of a basic principle for model driven engineering.” Novatica Journal, Special Issue 5.2 (2004): 21-24. (a brief introduction with some illustrations, see What is MDE?)

—-
Update. In both Figure 1 and 2, on the relationship from System (/ Operational Device)  to System Model, the label was wrong as “conforms-to”, and now it is corrected to “represented-by”. That is the same with the relationship from Target Thing to Applied Model. (Sorry to readers before! March 9 am.)

Copyright

Creative Commons License
Model-Driven Applications vs. Model-Driven Engineering by Tong-Ying Yu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.

Cite Style

GB7714 style: Tong-Ying Yu. Model-Driven Applications vs. Model-Driven Engineering[EB/OL]. EE-Forum.org, http://www.ee-forum.org/wp/pub/ty/2013-03-p3522.html, 2013-03-08[2017-09-20 01:14]

Chicago style: Tong-Ying Yu, "Model-Driven Applications vs. Model-Driven Engineering", EE-Forum.org, http://www.ee-forum.org/wp/pub/ty/2013-03-p3522.html(accessed 2017-09-20 01:14)

Posted by   2013-03-08(Original)   Hits 8330   Modified 2013-03-16
Prev Post: 
Next Post: 

Related Entries:

Multiple Model-Driven Mechanism: Making Metamodel Evolutionary at Runtime
An FMC ER Diagram Model of Model-Driven Mechanism (MDM)
On Models and Domains for Model Driven Applications
What Is Model-Driven Application
Some Discussions about Jorgensen’s 8 Principles for Model-Driven Applications

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.